HC 433 Herzing University MCO Opportunity Memorandum Course

HC 433 Herzing University MCO Opportunity Memorandum Course

HC 433 Herzing University MCO Opportunity Memorandum Course

HC 433School

Herzing UniversityDepartment

HC

Question Description

Unit 2 Assignment – MCO Opportunity Memo

Submit Assignment

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 50
  • Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload

Instructions

As a manager in a medical setting, it is an expectation to continuously seek out new opportunities to save money and manage patients more efficiently. In this scenario, assume the role of a manager in a medical clinic. A new opportunity to work with an MCO has been made available to the clinic and needs to be brought to the senior management team.

Evaluation Title: MCO Opportunity Memo

Instructions:

  • Write a memo to the senior management staff explaining the new MCO opportunity.
  • In the memo, include the following:
    • Summarize the three reimbursement methodologies (capitation, discounted fees, and salaries) in 250 words or less.
    • Choose one of the three reimbursement methodologies to recommend to the senior staff.
    • Provide rationale for the selection.
    • Discuss the pros and cons of the methodology.

Estimated time to complete: 2 hours

Rubric

HC433 Unit 2 Assignment – MCO Opportunity Memo

CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent20.0 ptsLevel 5Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.18.0 ptsLevel 4Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.16.0 ptsLevel 3Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.14.0 ptsLevel 2Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.12.0 ptsLevel 1Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is no evidence of a defined statement.20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P20.0 ptsLevel 5Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.18.0 ptsLevel 4Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.16.0 ptsLevel 3Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.14.0 ptsLevel 2Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.12.0 ptsLevel 1Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.0.0 ptsLevel 0Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting5.0 ptsLevel 5The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.4.5 ptsLevel 4The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.4.0 ptsLevel 3The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.3.5 ptsLevel 2The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.3.0 ptsLevel 1The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.0.0 ptsLevel 0The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning.5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I5.0 ptsLevel 5The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.4.5 ptsLevel 4The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.4.0 ptsLevel 3The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.5 ptsLevel 2The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.0 ptsLevel 1Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.5.0 pts
Total Points: 50.0
%d bloggers like this: